What is actually meant by the term ‘diversity’ in the context of employing people? I’ve heard it explained multiple ways, and even been told it is a 50/50 female to male employment ratio.

Given the confusion, it’s time to explore the topic.

What Is This Thing Called Diversity?

“Diversity” in the context of employing people refers to the representation and inclusion of individuals from different backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives in the workplace. This can encompass a wide range of dimensions, including but not limited to:

1. Race and Ethnicity: Recognising and valuing differences in racial and ethnic backgrounds.

2. Gender: Ensuring fair representation of men and women. I’ll leave the arguments about “non-binary individuals” for others to have.

3. Age: Balancing younger and older employees, recognising the value each group brings.

4. Sexual Orientation: Including individuals irrespective of whom they choose to love.

5. Socioeconomic Status: Recognising and valuing individuals regardless of their economic or class background.

6. Religion: Respecting and accommodating a variety of religious beliefs and practices.

7. Disability: Employing and supporting individuals with physical, mental, or emotional disabilities.

8. Educational Background: Recognising the value of different educational experiences and credentials, which doesn’t solely prioritise elite or traditional educational paths.

9. Geographic Origin: Respecting individuals from various parts of the world or different regions of a country.

10. Cultural Background: Appreciating the traditions, values, and perspectives of various cultures.

11. Military Service: Recognising and valuing the experiences and skills of veterans.

12. Neurodiversity: Acknowledging and supporting individuals with different neurological conditions or cognitive differences, such as those with autism, ADHD, dyslexia, etc.

Benefits of Diversity

In the workplace, diversity is often seen as beneficial for multiple reasons:

1. Innovation: Diverse teams tend to come up with more creative solutions to problems.

2. Representation: A diverse workforce can better understand and serve diverse customer bases.

3. Talent Pool: Drawing from a more diverse talent pool allows companies to hire the best candidates.

4. Improved Performance: Research indicates that diverse teams tend to outperform homogenous ones in various tasks.

5. Cultural Competency: Diverse teams can operate more effectively in global markets.

6. Inclusive Work Environment: A diverse workforce promotes an environment where everyone feels they belong and can contribute their best.

To be truly effective, workplace diversity should be complemented by inclusivity.

While diversity focuses on the composition of the workforce, inclusion is about ensuring that all employees are treated fairly, have equal access to opportunities and resources, and can contribute fully to the organisation’s success.

50/50 Female/Male Ratio

A 50/50 ratio of female and male employees is just one aspect of gender diversity, but it doesn’t capture the full essence or complexity of what workplace diversity encompasses.

Diversity in the workplace involves recognising and valuing differences across multiple dimensions, such as race, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, religion, disability, socioeconomic status, education, and many others, as previously mentioned.

But since its been suggested to me, let’s address the 50/50 gender ratio specifically:

1. Symbolic Significance:

Achieving a 50/50 gender ratio can be symbolic for industries or sectors where one gender has been historically underrepresented.

For instance, in technology or engineering fields, there has been a noted underrepresentation of women. Achieving gender parity in such fields can indicate progress toward eliminating systemic barriers.

2. Not Always the Goal:

While gender parity might be a target for some organisations, diversity efforts should not be reduced to just achieving this ratio. It’s also about creating an inclusive environment where all genders feel valued and supported.

3. Nuance and Depth:

Even within the context of gender, it’s essential to recognise that not all experiences are the same. Women of different ethnicities, disabilities, socioeconomic statuses, and other backgrounds will have varied experiences.

Intersectionality, a term coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw, reminds us that people can face multiple and interlocking forms of discrimination.

4. Other Dimensions of Diversity:

Gender is just one facet. True diversity efforts should encompass a broader range of attributes. For instance, a company might have a 50/50 gender ratio but still lack representation from certain racial or ethnic groups or exclude those with disabilities.

5. Broader Inclusivity:

Alongside numerical representation, it’s crucial to foster a culture of inclusivity. It’s possible for an organisation to have diverse demographics but still perpetuate a culture where minority groups feel marginalised.

In summary, while a 50/50 gender ratio can be a valuable target for certain industries or sectors, diversity is about much more than just gender ratios.

True diversity involves both breadth (across various dimensions of identity) and depth (considering the nuanced experiences within those dimensions).

The Dangers of Diversity

While the pursuit of diversity in the workplace and other environments is generally seen as a positive and necessary endeavour for various reasons, there are potential pitfalls and challenges associated with it.

Here are some of the commonly discussed “dangers” or challenges associated with diversity:

1. Resistance to Change:

A push for diversity can be met with resistance from those who perceive it as a threat to their status or feel that it compromises meritocracy. This resistance can lead to friction and divisions within an organisation.

2. Tokenism:

There’s a risk that companies might pursue diversity for optics rather than genuine inclusion. Hiring or promoting individuals from underrepresented groups primarily for the sake of appearances can lead to feelings of marginalisation and undermine the real value of diversity.

3. Misunderstandings and Conflicts:

Diverse teams, especially if not well-integrated or if individuals are not culturally competent, can experience misunderstandings or conflicts due to differences in communication styles, values, or perspectives.

4. Integration Challenges:

With a more diverse team, there might be challenges in creating a cohesive team identity, especially if inclusive practices are not in place.

5. Perceived Favouritism:

Diversity initiatives, especially affirmative action or quota systems, can sometimes lead to perceptions (whether accurate or not) that certain groups are receiving undue favour or advantages.

6. Overemphasis on Differences:

While recognising and valuing differences is essential, there’s a danger in focusing too much on what sets individuals apart rather than on shared goals, values, or attributes that unite a team or community.

7. Risk of Stereotyping:

In some cases, diversity efforts, if not thoughtfully implemented, can unintentionally perpetuate stereotypes.

For instance, assigning a specific minority group member to a task because it’s assumed they’ll have a specific perspective can be problematic.

8. Complexity in Decision Making:

Diverse teams bring a wide range of perspectives and ideas, which can sometimes slow down the decision-making process. However, while it might take longer, the decisions reached are often more innovative and robust.

9. Potential for Backlash:

Especially in situations where diversity is pushed aggressively without proper framing or education, there can be backlash from individuals who feel that they are being sidelined or treated unfairly.

10. Surface-Level Diversity:

Focusing only on visible markers of diversity, like race or gender, without considering cognitive or experiential diversity, can be limiting.

It’s worth noting that many of these “dangers” or challenges can be mitigated or transformed into strengths with thoughtful and strategic implementation of diversity and inclusion initiatives.

Organisations can benefit from training programs, open dialogues, and policies that promote inclusivity alongside diversity to harness the full potential of a diverse workforce.

Examples of Success with Diversity

Certainly, the benefits of diversity have been demonstrated in numerous settings and industries. Here are two examples where diversity has been particularly successful:

Apple Inc.

Background: Apple has consistently strived to boost its diversity, particularly because its products are used globally by a diverse range of consumers. As of my last update in 2021, while Apple still had work to do, it made significant strides in increasing diversity in its workforce.

Results: As Apple enhanced its diversity and inclusion efforts, it was better able to innovate and create products suited to a global audience. Apple’s voice assistant, Siri, can understand and speak in numerous languages and dialects. Apple also introduced features tailored for users with disabilities, like VoiceOver (for visually impaired users) and features for the hearing impaired. The tech giant credits its diverse workforce for many of these innovations.

Broader Impact: Apple’s focus on diversity and the subsequent inclusive features in its products pushes other tech companies to do the same, setting industry standards for both workforce diversity and product inclusivity.

NBA – National Basketball Association

Background: The NBA is one of the most diverse sports leagues, with players from various racial, ethnic, and national backgrounds. Over time, it has also fostered diversity in coaching, management, and other organisational roles.

Results: The diversity of the NBA has broadened the appeal of the league to global audiences. International players have brought different playing styles and techniques, enhancing the quality and variety of the game. The NBA’s international games and events have gained enormous popularity, partly because fans around the world see representation in the players.

Broader Impact: The NBA’s success with international diversity has influenced other sports leagues to scout and invest in international talent. The presence of international players in the league also serves as a bridge, fostering understanding and cultural exchange between different nations.

In both examples, the organisations recognised that a diverse team isn’t just an asset but is crucial for growth, innovation, and global relevance.

Examples of Where Diversity Has Failed

It’s important to note that when diversity efforts don’t achieve their desired results, it’s often due to implementation flaws, organisational culture issues, or resistance rather than the concept of diversity itself.

Here are two examples where efforts to promote diversity faced challenges:


Background: Google, like many tech companies, has been under scrutiny for its lack of diversity. Despite various initiatives to increase diversity, the company faced internal and external challenges.

Challenges: In 2017, a controversy arose when a Google engineer released a memo arguing against the company’s diversity initiatives, suggesting that biological differences were a significant reason for gender disparities in tech. The memo’s circulation led to heated debates and divisions, revealing resistance to diversity efforts within the company. While Google took action in this specific instance, it was indicative of broader internal sentiments and challenges the company faced in cultivating a more diverse and inclusive environment.

Broader Impact: This incident at Google underscored the tech industry’s ongoing struggles with gender representation and the broader challenges of fostering an inclusive culture in the face of deeply entrenched beliefs.

Harvard University Admissions Controversy

Background: Harvard University, one of the U.S.’s premier institutions, has long utilised a holistic admissions process, which considers multiple aspects of an applicant’s profile, including race, to foster a diverse student body.

Challenges: In recent years, Harvard faced legal challenges alleging that its admissions process discriminated against Asian American applicants. Plaintiffs argued that the university’s efforts to ensure a racially diverse student body resulted in an unfair penalty for Asian American students. While the court upheld Harvard’s admissions process, citing the value of student body diversity, the controversy highlighted the complex and sometimes contentious nature of efforts to promote diversity.

Broader Impact: This case brought national attention to the challenges of promoting diversity in higher education. It sparked debates about the nature of affirmative action, the value of diversity, and how institutions can ensure fair and equitable processes.

In both cases, the challenges aren’t necessarily arguments against the value of diversity but highlight the complexities and sensitivities surrounding its implementation. They underscore the importance of thoughtful, transparent, and inclusive approaches to diversity efforts.

5 Tips for Making Diversity Work In Your Organisation

1. Start with Leadership Commitment:

Why: Leadership sets the tone for the entire organisation. When leaders actively prioritise and commit to diversity, it sends a clear message to the entire workforce.

How: Leadership should participate in diversity training, regularly communicate the importance of diversity to organisational success, and be accountable for meeting diversity and inclusion goals.

2. Establish Clear Goals and Metrics:

Why: Without clear goals and ways to measure progress, diversity efforts can become directionless or superficial.

How: Define what diversity means for your business context. Set specific targets for recruitment, retention, and promotion. Collect data and regularly review these metrics to measure progress and make necessary adjustments.

3. Promote an Inclusive Culture:

Why: Diversity without inclusion is meaningless. Employees from diverse backgrounds must feel valued, understood, and integrated into the organisation’s culture.

How: Encourage open dialogues where employees can share experiences and perspectives. Establish Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) or affinity groups for underrepresented communities. Train managers on inclusive leadership practices to ensure they’re supporting and understanding their diverse teams.

4. Invest in Continuous Education and Training:

Why: Unconscious biases can hinder diversity efforts, and many employees may not even be aware they hold these biases.

How: Implement regular training sessions on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Address unconscious bias and provide tools and strategies to combat it. Ensure that training is refreshed periodically and that it evolves with the times.

5. Broaden Recruitment Efforts:

Why: Traditional recruitment methods can often favour certain groups and exclude others, either intentionally or inadvertently.

How: Collaborate with a wide range of educational institutions, attend diverse job fairs, and utilise platforms that cater to diverse job seekers. Revise job descriptions to ensure they’re inclusive and don’t inadvertently deter certain groups. Implement structured interviews to ensure that the hiring process is consistent and minimises bias.

Remember, genuine diversity efforts go beyond just numbers. It’s about creating an environment where every individual, regardless of their background, can contribute to the fullest and feel a sense of belonging. It’s an ongoing effort that requires commitment, introspection, and regular review.

More Information

For more information about the work of this author, visit www.9skillsfactory.com [add link] where you’ll discover one of the most significant professional development programs in the world today covering topics of leadership, influence, business execution, and lean six sigma.

Share This